He insistently asks the question, but that the natural is definitely incurable, like the rising corpse inside Amédée, can be something they refuses to help accept. If it's a law, then he forbids the idea, but what for you to do is another matter. If he approaches on times, then avoids, this elegiac estrangement of this Beckettian nothing to become done—whether having Hamm's older stancher or Pozzo's mournful “On! ”—he can't really buy the solutions of those who deny on ideological grounds what he / she virtually takes on belief, the fact that “a human fraternity good spiritual condition can be more safe and sound than 1 grounded throughout politics. A new question without a metaphysical answer is far considerably more authentic. As well as in the conclusion [more] beneficial than all the phony and partial answers granted by politics” (“Why Do I actually Write” 14). Struggling to imagine the infinite and even ruined to know nothing at all, what we might be aware of is this: “all is tragedy, ” worldwide disaster, unexplainable simply by authentic din. As for national politics, particularly revolutionary politics, gowns a delusion. “We make revolutions to start proper rights and tyranny. We produce injustice and tyranny” (“Why Do I Write” 10). What can be performed if at all? Ignore ideology, and kill simply because little as probable. Immediately